Schedule a Consultation
Structured Statement-of-Work engagements for cloud migrations, ERP implementations, application modernization, data programs, and managed services — with the scope, the timeline, and the success criteria written into the contract.
Time-and-materials staffing is the right answer for some problems and the wrong answer for many others. When the scope is clear, the target architecture is set, and the success criteria can be written down — billing by the hour shifts every incentive in the wrong direction. SOW-based engagements flip that. The vendor wears the timeline risk. The price is set against the outcome. The team rotates around the deliverable, not the calendar.
Exolios SOW engagements are built specifically for the work where the boundaries are knowable: a cloud migration with a clear estate, an ERP implementation with a defined module footprint, an application modernization with target platform agreed, a managed services run with measurable SLAs. We bring the team, the delivery discipline, and the accountability — you get the milestone, the deliverable, and the receipt.
A direct comparison against the two most common alternatives — Time & Materials staff augmentation and Managed Services contracts.
Every Exolios SOW follows the same five-phase lifecycle — calibrated to the program shape, but always recognizable. Predictability is the feature.
Joint scoping with your business and IT stakeholders. Current-state assessment, constraint mapping, dependency surfacing, and acceptance-criteria drafting.
Target architecture, work breakdown, milestone plan, RACI, risk register, and the priced SOW itself — with assumptions explicitly enumerated.
Sprint-paced execution with milestone-based billing. Weekly status, monthly steering committee, transparent burn-down against acceptance criteria.
Post-go-live stabilization. Defect triage, performance tuning, knowledge transfer to client run teams, and exit-readiness verification against pre-agreed criteria.
Formal handover, documentation lockdown, residual-risk register, post-engagement review, and either close-out or transition into a managed-services SOW.
Most pods spin up within 10 business days of signed SOW — talent already pre-vetted, contracts already drafted.
Contractual cap on cumulative change-order growth before re-baselining is required — protects both sides from drift.
No SOW signs without exit criteria written in plain language. Milestone billing only releases against acceptance.
Not every program is a good fit for SOW. These six shapes consistently are — because the scope is bound, the success criteria are measurable, and the vendor can credibly carry the timeline risk.
End-to-end migration programs across AWS, Azure, and GCP — including assessment, landing zone, application waves, and decommissioning.
SAP S/4HANA, Oracle Fusion, Salesforce, and Microsoft Dynamics implementations — greenfield, brownfield, or selective conversion paths.
Legacy estate modernization — monolith decomposition, micro-service redesign, container adoption, and event-driven re-architecture.
Data lake, data warehouse, and analytics modernization programs — including governance, lineage, and the AI-readiness layer underneath.
Run-state operations — application support, infrastructure operations, ERP AMS, cloud FinOps, and security operations — under SLA.
Greenfield AI/ML platform builds, RAG architectures, MLOps environments, and the data-platform groundwork required underneath them.
Six operating commitments that show up in every Exolios SOW — written into the contract, not the marketing slide.
No statement of work signs without unambiguous, measurable acceptance criteria for every milestone. We negotiate harder upfront so we negotiate less in delivery.
Invoicing is tied to acceptance, not the calendar. Released milestones release payment. Unreleased milestones don't. The accountability lives in the schedule.
Every change order shows the delta against baseline scope, the cumulative drift, and the price impact on a single page. No hidden re-baselining.
Pods are constructed with clear local-market and India delivery ratios — disclosed in the SOW so you know exactly who sits where.
Every SOW includes a documented KT plan with deliverable artifacts — not "we'll figure it out at the end." Exit-readiness is part of the contract.
Work authorization reviewed, equal opportunity compliant, FEMA-aligned for cross-border payments. The legal scaffolding is solved before the first invoice is raised.
SOW engagements are the right structure when scope can be defined, success can be measured, and the timeline matters. Particularly:
A discovery conversation, a structured assessment, and a fixed-price proposal — typically within four to six weeks, sometimes faster. Tell us what you're building.
Discuss an SOW